Today in class we discussed what is dishonest and inauthentic online. We also read some Facebook stories that related to the topic. The first example of being inauthentic or dishonest was strictly posting photos in which felt you looked good. It never occurred to me that posting those types of photos could be perceived in that way. Personally I try to do the same, but my intention is never to be inauthentic or dishonest. I like to think about it as presenting yourself as best as you can. For example, it is considered unprofessional to show up to most job interviews in sweats and a hoodie. Online we try to do the same through the use of lighting, filters, and even poses.
A big component that we explored in our group was the intention of the user. It becomes complicated when we think about why users post what they do. As fellow users we know that people have the ability to create false personas. The idea of fraudulence is probably what led to the rise of what is dishonest and inauthentic. I think the spectrum of what is accepted as inauthentic and dishonest is becoming more generally accepted. Technology widening its horizons and that means it needs to be monitored more. However, that does not mean we must be authentic on all platforms. There are some platforms that leave the notion of self up or interpretation to the user. Those platforms typically tend to be role playing games. In my opinion the inauthenticity comes into play on more social platforms rather than gaming platforms. It is not as crucial to lie about your age on Minecraft compared to Facebook.
In conclusion I think we all have a part of us that puts the best version of ourselves on our social media. The intent is not to be inauthentic but to follow an unsaid code of social media. The use of filters and editing photos should be accepted more rather than scolded. Cheers to the wonderful world of filters!